Documentation support
Draft visit summaries, letters and structured notes from source material for a clinician to review and sign, not replace their judgment.
AI can lift real weight off clinical and administrative teams, but only if protected health information stays protected. We build AI workflows around HIPAA-aligned safeguards: access control, audit trails, providers that will sign a BAA and won’t train on your data, and private deployment when the use case demands it.
The safest early wins are the repetitive, documentation-heavy tasks that surround care rather than the diagnosis itself, with a person reviewing anything that touches a clinical decision.
Draft visit summaries, letters and structured notes from source material for a clinician to review and sign, not replace their judgment.
Turn free-text intake into structured data and route requests to the right place, with clear boundaries on anything that needs a human decision.
Let authorized staff ask questions across records and policies and get a cited answer, with retrieval that respects who is allowed to see what.
Assist with coding, prior-authorization prep and claims paperwork, cutting the manual load while keeping a human on the final call.
The model is the easy part. These are the controls that let a covered entity actually put it near protected health information. The AI engineering itself draws on our AI development practice.
We use model and cloud providers that will sign a Business Associate Agreement and contractually will not train on your data, settled before any PHI moves.
Retrieval and prompts scoped by role, with the minimum PHI necessary sent to the model, and redaction where the full record isn’t needed.
Answers grounded in your own records and policies with citations, so output is traceable to a source instead of invented, built on our RAG engineering.
Every prompt, retrieval and output logged and traceable, with monitoring so unusual access is visible, the evidence your compliance program relies on.
Clinical and high-stakes output is proposed for review, never acted on automatically, with clear overrides so a person always makes the final call.
Where the use case demands it, we run models in your own cloud tenancy or a private environment, so sensitive data never leaves boundaries you control.
We move carefully with PHI, proving safeguards and value on a narrow, low-risk use case before widening scope.
We map what PHI is involved, what the AI will and will not decide, and where a human must stay in the loop.
BAAs, access control, retrieval, redaction, audit logging and guardrails go in before the feature does, not after.
We launch supervised on a narrow use case, measure quality, hand over documentation and widen scope only as the evidence earns it.
Using AI with health data raises fair concerns. Here are straight answers, without the false promises.
Ask us somethingOnly under the right agreement. We use enterprise tiers from providers that will sign a BAA and contractually will not train on your data, send the minimum PHI necessary, and deploy privately when the use case calls for it. Consumer chatbot endpoints are never used with PHI.
No one honestly can, because compliance is an ongoing program rather than a switch. We build the AI workflow around HIPAA-aligned technical and security safeguards and give you the documentation and audit trail your compliance process needs.
Not on its own. We design these systems so a qualified person reviews anything clinical. The AI drafts, structures and surfaces information to save time; the decision and the sign-off stay with your team.
Yes, where it matters. We can deploy models inside your own cloud tenancy or a private environment so PHI never leaves boundaries you control, trading some model choice for maximum data control.
Tell us what you are building. We will come back within one business day with questions, not a pitch deck.
Only relevant questions appear as you make selections.